Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Euler's avatar

The case for oil doesn't need for climate change to be a hoax. It's enough that the damages from energy shortage dwarf the implications of a few extra years of carbon emissions until we transition into nuclear energy to make a very compelling case for a change in policy. It will convince a lot more people because your proposition does not contradict their beliefs.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts