Discussion about this post

User's avatar
AVI's avatar

Interesting. Curious why is the strike on PDP of $6.5b and not total proved of $11.2b? Given future development costs are on total proved? Same thing with reserve life...using PDP but reserve life of ~17 years based on proved + PUD i.e. proved RLI only 12.5 years?

Expand full comment
Igor Skokov's avatar

Newby take: if oil price is log normal and stock price is 100% correlated with oil price (which I believe it is) - then your exposure to oil stocks should be probably somehow proportional to area under the curve to the right of current price. Means - the higher oil price the less exposure you should have. Never to zero but 100% is also rather exceptional (like in once-in-a lifetime case with negative prices).

Of course this curve is not static and changes over time. And thought must be given if it commands your total exposure or just %% of your new investment related to available cash pool. But still it’s worth further elaboration.

Michael, thank you for this post, it gives some fuel to thinking.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts